<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Tapered Beam stability check - Structural &amp; Architectural Design				            </title>
            <link>https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/</link>
            <description>Timber Engineering Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Tapered Beam stability check</title>
                        <link>https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-206</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 02:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Thanks @heblomgren 
While it is not the official recommendation blessed by AWC, I think this is a rational approach. It is good to see American Institute of Timber Construction Manual has a...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks @heblomgren </p>
<p>While it is not the official recommendation blessed by AWC, I think this is a rational approach. It is good to see American Institute of Timber Construction Manual has a dedicated chapter for tapered beam. </p>
<p>In Eurocode 1995 the tapered beam has a dedicated section (6.4) to consider modification to the "allowable" stress due to taper. But the stability check is in a separate section (6.3) and there is no explicit instruction of how to consider taper in 6.3... </p>
<p>I think this is something that may require more research. But it is a problem probably not significant enough to raise funding to do it.... Maybe I can write a paper on it when I have free time. In practice I will always go with largest depth for stability check if I am to stamp the design &#x1f609; </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/">Structural &amp; Architectural Design</category>                        <dc:creator>Shiling Pei</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-206</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Tapered Beam stability check</title>
                        <link>https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-204</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[@ling - Hi.  An answer I found comes from the AITC Manual Chapter 7 on Tapered Beam Design - See attached screen snap.  Don&#039;t forget the Ci and Cvr factor that apply to tapered members and t...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ling - Hi.  An answer I found comes from the AITC Manual Chapter 7 on Tapered Beam Design - See attached screen snap.  Don't forget the Ci and Cvr factor that apply to tapered members and that the taper should be on the compression side.  Also - tapered beam have a very important specification regarding the lamination layup and the design strength.  This is specified in ANSI 117.  2nd screen snap is the explanation of this in AITC Manual.  Lastly - this is a good AWC reference on stability design of beams.  It does not look to include any discussion on tapered beams.  https://awc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/AWC-TR14-0312.pdf</p>
278
279
<p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/">Structural &amp; Architectural Design</category>                        <dc:creator>HEBlomgren</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-204</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Tapered Beam stability check</title>
                        <link>https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-195</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 17:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Is there any explicit recommendation in NDS on stability factor CL calculation for Tapered beams?
say I have a beam start from 20&quot; on one end and go to 10&quot; on the other end, what depth shou...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any explicit recommendation in NDS on stability factor CL calculation for Tapered beams?</p>
<p>say I have a beam start from 20" on one end and go to 10" on the other end, what depth should I use to go into the CL calculation?</p>
<p>Using 20 is apparently conservative and OK, but is there any explicit rule for that?</p>
<p><span>@billkirkham  @heblomgren  @johnlawson</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/">Structural &amp; Architectural Design</category>                        <dc:creator>Shiling Pei</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://timberengineering.org/community/structural-architectural-design/tapered-beam-stability-check/#post-195</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		